UPDATED [Dec 04, 2025] Pass PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor中文版) Exam with Latest Questions
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Practice Questions prepared by PECB Professionals
NEW QUESTION # 173
情境 6：Sinvestment 是一家提供家庭保險、商業保險和人壽保險的保險公司。該公司成立於北卡羅來納州，但最近在其他地區進行了擴張，包括歐洲和非洲。
Sinvestment 致力於遵守適用於其行業的法律法規，並防止任何資訊安全事件。他們實施了基於 ISO/IEC 27001 的 ISMS 並申請了 ISO/IEC 27001 認證。
認證機構指派兩名審核員進行審核。與Sinvestment簽訂保密協議後。他們開始了審計活動。首先，他們審查了標準要求的文件，包括 ISMS 範圍聲明、資訊安全政策和內部稽核報告。審查過程並不容易，因為儘管 Sinvestment 表示他們已製定文件程序，但並非所有文件都具有相同的格式。
隨後，審計小組對Sinvestment的高階主管進行了多次訪談，以了解他們在ISMS實施中的作用。第一階段審計的所有活動都是遠端進行的，除了根據 Sinvestment 的要求在現場進行的文件資訊審查之外。
在此階段，審計人員發現沒有與資訊安全培訓和意識計劃相關的文件。被問及時，Sinvestment代表表示，公司已為所有員工提供資訊安全培訓課程。第一階段審計讓審計團隊對 Sinvestment 的營運和 ISMS 有了整體了解。
第二階段審核在第一階段審核三週後進行。審計小組觀察到，行銷部門（未包含在審計範圍內）沒有適當的程序來控制員工的存取權限。由於控制員工的存取權限是ISO/IEC 27001的要求之一，並且已包含在公司的資訊安全政策中，因此該問題包含在審計報告中。此外，在第二階段審計中，審計小組觀察到Sinvestment沒有記錄使用者活動日誌。
該公司的程序規定“記錄用戶活動的日誌應保留並定期審查”，但該公司沒有提供任何執行該程序的證據。
在所有審核活動中，審核員透過觀察、訪談、文件化資訊審查、分析和技術驗證來收集資訊和證據。對第一階段和第二階段的所有審核結果進行了分析，審核小組決定發布積極的認證建議。
根據情境 6，在第一階段審核期間，審核員發現一些有關 ISMS 的文件具有不同的格式。在這種情況下，審計師該做什麼？
- A. 僅驗證是否記錄了標準要求的信息，而不考慮格式，因為這不是標準的要求
- B. 驗證記錄的資訊是否具有適當的格式並且符合公司的記錄程序，因為這是標準的要求
- C. 將此觀察結果記錄為第 2 階段應在審核期間驗證的問題
Answer: A
Explanation:
The auditor should verify if the information required by the standard is documented, without necessarily focusing on the format, as long as the content meets the requirements of the standard. ISO/IEC 27001 does not mandate a specific format for documentation, only that necessary information is appropriately documented, maintained, and controlled.
References: ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Clause 7.5 (Documented information)
NEW QUESTION # 174
本組織擁有第三方認證機構核發的 ISO/IEC 27001 資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS) 認證。下列哪一項代表了擁有認可認證的優點？
- A. 審核報告的清晰度
- B. 組織產品的行銷價格上漲
- C. 客戶端數量增加
- D. 對認證過程可信度的認可。
Answer: D
Explanation:
One of the advantages of having accredited certification of ISMS to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is that it demonstrates the recognition of the credibility of the certification process. Accredited certification means that the certification body has been assessed and approved by an accreditation body, which ensures that the certification body operates according to international standards and follows impartiality, competence and consistency principles. Accredited certification also enhances the confidence of the organisation's customers, partners, regulators and other interested parties in the organisation's information security performance and compliance. References: = ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 0.2; [PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor], page 6; Key Benefits of ISO 27001 Certification - IT Governance.
NEW QUESTION # 175
您正在一家提供醫療保健服務的住宅療養院進行 ISMS 審核。審核計畫的下一步是驗證資訊安全事件管理流程。 IT 安全經理介紹了資訊安全事件管理程序，並解釋該流程基於 ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016。
您查看該文件並注意到一條聲明「任何資訊安全弱點、事件和事故應在識別後 1 小時內報告給聯絡人 (PoC)」。在訪問員工時，您發現大家對「弱點、事件、事件」意義的理解有差異。
您從事件追蹤系統中抽取過去 6 個月的事件報告記錄樣本，總結結果如下表所示。
您想進一步調查其他領域以收集更多審計證據。選擇兩個不會出現在您的審核追蹤中的選項。
- A. 收集更多關於公司如何以及何時支付贖金以解鎖公司手機和資料（即信用卡和銀行轉帳）的證據。 （與控制措施 A.5.26 相關）
- B. 收集有關人力資源經理如何以及何時支付贖金以解鎖個人行動資料（即信用卡和銀行轉帳）的更多證據。 （與控制措施 A.5.26 相關）
- C. 收集更多有關醫療保健監測服務要求的證據。 （與第4.2條相關）
- D. 收集更多有關組織如何確定事件恢復時間的證據。 （與控制措施 A.5.27 相關）
- E. 透過訪問更多員工了解他們對報告流程的理解來收集更多證據。
（與控制措施 A.6.8 相關） - F. 收集更多有關事件恢復程序的證據。 （與控制措施 A.5.26 相關）
- G. 收集更多證據，說明組織如何確定事件發生後無需採取進一步行動。 （與控制措施 A.5.26 相關）
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, which specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an information security management system (ISMS), clause 4.2 requires an organization to determine the needs and expectations of interested parties that are relevant to its ISMS1. This includes identifying the legal, regulatory, contractual and other requirements that apply to its information security activities1. Therefore, collecting more evidence on what the service requirements of healthcare monitoring are may not be relevant to verifying the information security incident management process, as it is not directly related to the audit objective or criteria. This option will not be in the audit trail.
NEW QUESTION # 176
資訊階段
- A. 創造、演化、維護、使用、處置
- B. 建立、分發、使用、維護、處置
- C. 建立、分發、維護、處置、使用
- D. 建立、使用、處置、維護、演變
Answer: B
Explanation:
The stages of information are creation, distribution, use, maintenance, and disposition. These are the phases that information goes through during its lifecycle, from the moment it is generated to the moment it is destroyed or archived. Each stage of information has different security requirements and risks, and should be managed accordingly. Creation, evolution, maintenance, use, and disposition are not the correct stages of information, as evolution is not a distinct stage, but a process that can occur in any stage. Creation, use, disposition, maintenance, and evolution are not the correct stages of information, as they are not in the right order. Creation, distribution, maintenance, disposition, and use are not the correct stages of information, as they are not in the right order. Reference: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 32. : [ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB], page 12.
NEW QUESTION # 177
您會在某些實體資產上看到藍色貼紙。這意味著什麼？
- A. 資產至關重要，影響力僅限於員工
- B. 資產非常重要，其故障會影響整個組織
- C. 帶有藍色貼紙的資產應始終保持空調狀態
- D. 資產非常關鍵，其故障將影響組織中小組/專案的工作
Answer: D
Explanation:
You see a blue color sticker on certain physical assets. This signifies that the asset is high critical and its failure will affect a group/s/project's work in the organization. A blue color sticker is a type of label that indicates the level of criticality of an asset, which is a measure of how important an asset is for the organization's operations and objectives. A high critical asset is an asset that has a significant impact on the organization's activities, and its loss or damage would cause major disruption or loss of service. A blue color sticker also implies that the asset requires a high level of protection and security, and should be handled with care. Reference: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 36. : [ISO/IEC 27001 Brochures | PECB], page 6.
NEW QUESTION # 178
選出最能完成句子的單字：
要使用最佳單字完成句子，請按一下要完成的空白部分，使其以紅色突出顯示，然後從下面的選項中按一下適用的文字。或者，您可以將該選項拖曳到適當的空白部分。
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
* A third-party audit team leader is a person who leads an audit team that conducts audits on behalf of an external organization, such as a certification body, that provides certification or accreditation services to other organizations12.
* One of the main responsibilities of a third-party audit team leader is to act on behalf of the certification body, which means to represent its interests, policies, and procedures during the audit process12.
* Acting on behalf of the certification body involves communicating with the audit client and the auditee, planning and conducting the audit, reporting and evaluating the audit results, and making recommendations for certification or accreditation decisions12.
* Acting on behalf of the certification body also requires maintaining professional integrity, impartiality, confidentiality, and competence throughout the audit process12.
References :=
* ISO 19011:2022 Guidelines for auditing management systems
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2022 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements
NEW QUESTION # 179
認證機構在決定授予認證時不需要審核報告中的下列哪一項結論？
- A. 解決與輕微不合格項相關的糾正措施的計劃已被接受
- B. 組織完全遵守適用於資訊安全管理系統的所有法律和其他要求。
- C. 組織針對重大不合格項採取的糾正措施已被接受。
- D. 已符合認證範圍
Answer: B
Explanation:
The conclusion in the audit report that is not required by the certification body when deciding to grant certification is that the organisation fully complies with all legal and other requirements applicable to the ISMS. This is because the certification body does not have the authority or the responsibility to verify the legal compliance of the organisation, as this is outside the scope of ISO/IEC 27001:2022. The certification body only evaluates the conformity of the organisation's ISMS with the requirements of the standard, which include the establishment of a process to identify and evaluate the legal and other requirements that are relevant to the ISMS. The organisation is responsible for ensuring its own legal compliance and for providing evidence of such compliance to the certification body if requested. References: = ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause
6.1.3; ISO/IEC 27006:2022, clause 9.2.2.4; PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 29.
NEW QUESTION # 180
您正在對位於歐洲的住宅進行 ISMS 審核
名為 ABC 的療養院提供醫療保健服務。您會發現所有療養院居民都戴著電子腕帶，用於監控他們的位置、心跳和血壓。您了解到，電子腕帶會自動將所有資料上傳到人工智慧（AI）雲端伺服器，供醫護人員進行健康監測和分析。
審核計畫的下一步是驗證高階管理人員是否已製定資訊安全策略和目標。
在審計過程中，你們發現以下審計證據。
將審核證據與 ISO/IEC 27001:2022 中的相應要求進行配對。
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 181
選出最能完成句子的單字：
Answer:
Explanation:
NEW QUESTION # 182
Finnco 是一家認證機構的子公司，為組織提供 ISMS 諮詢服務。
考慮到這種情況，認證機構什麼時候可以對組織進行認證？
- A. 如果自上次諮詢活動以來已經過了至少兩年
- B. 這種情況下沒有時間限制
- C. 任何時候都不會，因為這會帶來利益衝突
Answer: C
Explanation:
A certification body cannot certify an organization if it has provided consultancy services to that organization.
This situation presents a conflict of interest, as the certification body is required to maintain impartiality and objectivity. The ISO/IEC 17021-1 standard, which sets out requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems, specifies that providing both services to the same client is incompatible.
References: ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems
NEW QUESTION # 183
在第一階段審核開幕會議上，管理系統代表 (MSR) 要求擴大審核範圍，以包括自提出認證申請以來已擴展到的海外新地點。
選擇審計員應如何回應的兩個選項。
- A. 建議 MSR 可以納入範圍擴展，但必須履行既定程序
- B. 確定管理系統是否涵蓋新站點的流程，如果是，則繼續審核
- C. 通知 MSR 審核範圍已根據其初始申請確定，因此審核必須按計劃進行
- D. 建議MSR取消審核合約並重新申請新情況
- E. 通知MSR，在現有範圍內，可以毫無問題地包含新工作區
- F. 確認審核員將通知受審核方審核範圍將被修改以包含新的工作領域
Answer: A,B
Explanation:
The correct options for how the auditor should respond are:
* A. Advise the MSR that an extension of the scope may be incorporated but will have to go through established procedures
* D. Determine whether the Management System covers the processes at the new site and, if so, proceed with the audit These options are consistent with the ISO/IEC 27006:2015 standard, which states that any changes to the scope of certification should be notified by the client to the certification body, and that the certification body should evaluate and decide on these changes in accordance with its procedures1. The auditor should also verify that the ISMS is implemented and maintained at all sites included in the scope of certification1.
The other options are not appropriate for how the auditor should respond, because:
* B. Advise the MSR that the audit scope has been determined based on their initial application so the audit has to proceed as planned: This option is too rigid and does not allow for any flexibility or adaptation to the client's situation. The auditor should be open to consider any changes to the scope of certification that may have occurred since the initial application, as long as they are properly notified and evaluated by the certification body.
* C. Suggest that the MSR cancels the audit contract and reapplies for the new situation: This option is too drastic and unnecessary, as it would cause delays and costs for both the client and the certification body. The auditor should not suggest that the client cancels the audit contract, but rather that they follow the established procedures for requesting and approving an extension of the scope of certification.
* E. Advise the MSR that, within the existing scope, the new work area can be included without any problem: This option is too lenient and does not ensure that the new work area meets the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001 and the ISMS. The auditor should not assume that the new work area can be included within the existing scope without any problem, but rather that they need to verify that the ISMS is implemented and maintained at the new site, and that any changes to the scope of certification are approved by the certification body.
* F. Confirm that the auditor will advise the auditee that the audit scope will be revised to include the new work area: This option is too presumptuous and does not respect the authority of the certification body.
The auditor should not confirm that they will revise the audit scope to include the new work area, but rather that they will advise the certification body of the client's request for an extension of the scope of certification, and wait for their decision.
NEW QUESTION # 184
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核團隊領導，協助審核員接受培訓，撰寫第一份審核報告。
您想要檢查培訓中的審核員對審核報告內容相關術語的理解，並選擇透過展示以下範例來實現此目的。
對於每個範例，您在培訓中詢問審核員描述活動的正確術語是什麼 將活動與描述進行配對。
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
1. An auditor using a copy of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 to check that its requirements are met:
Termed: Reviewing audit criteria.
Justification: The auditor is comparing the auditee's information security management system (ISMS) against the established criteria outlined in the ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard. This activity falls under the use of audit criteria to determine conformity or nonconformity.
2. An auditor's note that the auditee is not adhering to its clear desk policy:
Termed: Identifying an audit finding.
Justification: The auditor has observed a deviation from the auditee's established policy on clear desks. This observation is documented as a potential nonconformity, which requires further investigation and evaluation.
3. An auditor making a decision regarding the auditee's conformity or otherwise to criteria:
Termed: Determining an audit conclusion.
Justification: Based on the collected audit evidence and evaluation against the established criteria, the auditor forms an opinion about the overall compliance of the auditee's ISMS. This opinion is the audit conclusion and is a key element of the audit report.
4. An auditor examining verifiable records relevant to the audit process:
Termed: Collecting audit evidence.
Justification: The auditor is gathering objective and verifiable information to support their findings and conclusions. This information comes from various sources, including documents, records, interviews, and observations.
NEW QUESTION # 185
一家電信公司使用 AES 方法來確保機密資訊受到保護。
這意味著他們使用單一密鑰來加密和
解密資訊。公司使用什麼樣的控制？
- A. 預防性
- B. 偵探
- C. 修正
Answer: A
Explanation:
The AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) method is a symmetric-key algorithm, meaning the same key is used for both encrypting and decrypting data1. This type of control is considered preventive because it is implemented to prevent unauthorized access to confidential information by ensuring that the data is unreadable to anyone who does not have the key. References: = The explanation is based on the general understanding of encryption as a security control within the field of information security, particularly as it pertains to the ISO/IEC 27001 standard for information security management systems (ISMS), which includes encryption as a preventive control measure.
NEW QUESTION # 186
選出最能完成句子的單字：
「在管理系統中維護法規遵從性的目的是要用最好的單字完成句子，請點擊要完成的空白部分，使其以紅色突出顯示，然後點擊來自的適用文字或者，您可以將選項拖放到對應的空白部分。
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2013, clause 5.2, the top management of an organization must establish, implement and maintain an information security policy that is appropriate to the purpose of the organization and provides a framework for setting information security objectives. The information security policy must also include a commitment to comply with the applicable legal, regulatory and contractual requirements, as well as any other requirements that the organization subscribes to. Therefore, maintaining regulatory compliance is part of fulfilling the management system policy and ensuring its effectiveness and suitability. References:
* ISO/IEC 27001:2013, Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, clause 5.2
* PECB Candidate Handbook ISO 27001 Lead Auditor, page 10
* ISO 27001 Policy: How to write it according to ISO 27001
NEW QUESTION # 187
請將角色與以下描述相符：
要完成該表，請按一下要完成的空白部分，使其以紅色突出顯示，然後從下面的選項中按一下適用的測試。或者，您可以將每個選項拖曳到相應的空白部分。
Answer:
Explanation:
Explanation:
* The auditee is the organization or part of it that is subject to the audit. The auditee could be internal or external to the audit client . The auditee should cooperate with the audit team and provide them with access to relevant information, documents, records, personnel, and facilities .
* The audit client is the organization or person that requests an audit. The audit client could be internal or external to the auditee . The audit client should define the audit objectives, scope, criteria, and programme, and appoint the audit team leader .
* The technical expert is a person who provides specific knowledge or expertise relating to the organization, activity, process, product, service, or discipline to be audited. The technical expert could be internal or external to the audit team . The technical expert should support the audit team in collecting and evaluating audit evidence, but should not act as an auditor .
* The observer is a person who accompanies the audit team but does not act as an auditor. The observer could be internal or external to the audit team . The observer should observe the audit activities without interfering or influencing them, unless agreed otherwise by the audit team leader and the auditee .
References :=
* [ISO 19011:2022 Guidelines for auditing management systems]
* [ISO/IEC 17021-1:2022 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements]
NEW QUESTION # 188
審核方法可以與代表受審核方的個人互動，也可以不互動。下列哪兩種方法具有互動性？
- A. 抽樣（例如產品）
- B. 分析審核前提供的文件
- C. 檢查地方當局的法律合規性
- D. 與受審核方一起檢討清單
- E. 進行採訪
- F. 透過即時視訊串流觀察執行的工作
Answer: D,E
Explanation:
According to the PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, audit methods can be classified into two categories: with or without interaction with individuals representing the auditee (page 12). Audit methods with interaction include reviewing checklists with auditee and conducting interviews, as they involve direct communication and feedback from the auditee. Audit methods without interaction include sampling (e.g. products), observing work performed via live video streaming, checking legal compliance with local authorities, and analysing documents provided in advance of the audit, as they do not require any dialogue or exchange with the auditee. Reference: PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 12.
NEW QUESTION # 189
場景 2：Knight 是一家來自美國北加州的電子公司，開發電玩遊戲機。 Knight 在全球擁有 300 多名員工。在成立五週年之際，他們決定推出 G-Console，這是一款面向全球市場的新一代電玩遊戲機。 G-Console被認為是2021年的終極媒體機，將為玩家帶來最佳的遊戲體驗。
主機包將包括一副 VR 耳機、兩個
遊戲和其他禮物。
多年來，公司透過誠信、誠實和尊重客戶而建立了良好的聲譽。這種良好的聲譽是大多數熱衷遊戲玩家在Knight的G-console一上市就想擁有它的原因之一。
Knight 除了是一家非常以客戶為導向的公司之外，
也因其開發品質獲得了遊戲產業的廣泛認可。他們的價格比合理標準允許的要高一些。
儘管如此，對於 Knight 的大多數忠實客戶來說，這並不是一個問題，因為它們的品質是一流的。
作為世界頂級視訊遊戲機開發商之一，Knight 也經常成為惡意活動的焦點。該公司的 ISMS 已投入運作一年多了。 ISMS 範圍包括 Knight 的所有部門（財務和人力資源部門除外）。
最近，奈特的一些包含專有資訊的文件被駭客洩露。 Knight 的事件回應團隊 (IRT) 立即開始分析系統的每個部分以及事件的詳細資訊。
IRT 的第一個懷疑是 Knight 的員工使用了弱密碼，因此很容易被未經授權存取其帳戶的駭客破解。然而，在仔細調查該事件後，IRT 確定駭客透過擷取檔案傳輸協定 (FTP) 流量來存取帳戶。
FTP 是一種用於在帳戶之間傳輸檔案的網路協定。它使用明文密碼進行身份驗證。
受此資訊安全事件的影響，在IRT的建議下，Knight決定用Secure Shell (SSH)協定取代FTP，這樣任何捕獲流量的人都只能看到加密的資料。
在這些變化之後，奈特進行了風險評估，以驗證控制措施的實施是否已將類似事件的風險降至最低。該過程的結果得到了 ISMS 專案經理的批准，他聲稱實施新控制措施後的風險等級符合公司的風險接受程度。
根據該場景，回答以下問題：
基於場景 2，Knight 決定用 Secure Shell (SSH) 協定取代 FTP。在這種情況下是否應該更新適用性聲明 (SoA)？
- A. 是的，新控制的實施應該合理並包含在 SoA 中
- B. 否，因為只有在新增控制項時才應更新 SoA，而不是在取消舊控制項時更新 SoA
- C. 不，使用 SSH 協定不是 ISO/IEC 27001 要求；且；因此，不需要包含在 SoA 中
Answer: A
Explanation:
The Statement of Applicability (SoA) is a core document within an ISMS that outlines the security controls an organization implements. When a new control, such as the SSH protocol, is implemented, it should be included in the SoA to reflect the current state of the ISMS. The SoA should be updated to justify the inclusion of the new control and to document how it is implemented within the organization12. References: = This guidance is based on the best practices for maintaining the SoA as per ISO/IEC 27001, which requires the SoA to be a living document that accurately reflects the security controls in use by the organization
NEW QUESTION # 190
場景 3：Rebuildy 是一家位於泰國曼谷的建築公司，專門從事住宅建築的設計、建造和維護。為了確保敏感專案資料和客戶資訊的安全，Rebuildy 決定實施基於 ISO/IEC 27001 的資訊安全管理系統 (ISMS)。
ISMS 實施成果如下
* 資訊安全是透過應用一系列安全控制和製定政策、流程和程序來實現的。
* 安全控制是根據風險評估實施的，旨在消除風險或將風險降低到可接受的水平。
* 所有流程均基於計劃-執行-檢查-行動 (PDCA) 模型確保 ISMS 的持續改進。
* 資訊安全政策是根據最佳安全實務起草的安全手冊的一部分，因此，它不是一份獨立的文件。
* 資訊安全角色和職責已在每位員工的職位說明中明確說明
* 資訊安全管理系統的管理評審是依照計畫的時間間隔進行的。
Rebuildy 在經歷了兩次中期管理評審和一次年度內部審計後申請了認證。該前員工向審計團隊成員 Electra 提交了書面證據，Rebuildy 的主要客戶 Electra 也提交了有關相同問題的證據，審計員決定保留這份證據，而不是前員工的證據。審計團隊成員一直與 Electra 保持聯繫，直至審計完成，討論審計期間發現的不符合。伊萊克特拉提供了額外的證據來支持這些發現。
在審核開始時，審核小組對公司高階主管進行了訪談，討論了高階主管對 ISMS 實施的承諾等事項。從這些討論中獲得的證據都記錄在書面確認書中，用於確定 Rebuildy 是否符合 ISO/IEC 27001 的幾個條款。其中，發現以下不符合：
* 在公司的財務報告系統中偵測到了不當的使用者存取控制設定實例。
* 尚未建立獨立的資訊安全政策。相反，該公司使用根據最佳安全實踐起草的安全手冊。
在收到審計團隊的這些文件後，團隊負責人會見了 Rebuildy 的高層管理層，介紹了審計結果。審計小組報告了與財務報告系統和缺乏獨立資訊安全政策有關的調查結果。高階主管對調查結果表示不滿，並認為審計組長的行為不專業，暗示他們可能會要求更換組長。迫於壓力，審計組長決定與高階主管合作，淡化所發現的不符合項的重要性。因此，審計團隊負責人調整了報告以呈現更有利的觀點，從而歪曲了 Rebuildy 合規問題的真實程度。
根據上述情景，回答以下問題：
根據情境 3 的最後一段，審計團隊負責人犯了什麼錯誤？
- A. 詐欺
- B. 嚴重疏忽
- C. 一般疏忽
Answer: A
Explanation:
The audit team leader knowingly falsified the audit report to downplay nonconformities.
Fraud involves intentional deception or misrepresentation of information, making this a fraudulent act.
A: Ordinary negligence (Incorrect):
Ordinary negligence is a failure to exercise reasonable care, but this case involved intentional misconduct.
B: Gross negligence (Incorrect):
Gross negligence is extreme carelessness but does not involve deliberate misrepresentation.
Relevant Standard Reference:
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
NEW QUESTION # 191
您是一位經驗豐富的 ISMS 審核員，在一家提供 ICT 回收服務的組織中進行第三方監督審核。公司不再需要的ICT設備由組織處理。它要么被重新調試並重複使用，要么被安全地銷毀。
您注意到房間角落的長凳上有兩台伺服器。兩者的項目上都貼有伺服器名稱、IP 位址和管理員密碼的貼圖。您向 ICT 經理詢問這些物品，他告訴您這些物品是昨天從一位老客戶那裡收到的一批貨物的一部分。
您應該採取哪一項行動？
- A. 針對控制提出不符合項 5.31 法律、法規、監管和合約要求'
- B. 記錄您在審核結果中看到的內容，但不採取進一步行動
- C. 請 ICT 經理記錄資訊安全事件並啟動資訊安全事件管理流程
- D. 針對控制措施 8.20「網路安全」提出不符合項（應保護、管理和控製網路和網路設備，以保護系統和應用程式中的資訊）
- E. 注意審核結果並檢查處理與客戶 IT 安全相關的進貨的流程
- F. 要求被審核方移除標籤，然後繼續審核
Answer: E
Explanation:
According to ISO 27001:2022 clause 8.1.4, the organisation shall ensure that externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system are controlled. This includes implementing appropriate contractual requirements related to information security with external providers, such as customers who send ICT equipment for reclamation12 In this case, the organisation offers ICT reclamation services, which involves processing customer ICT equipment that may contain sensitive or confidential information. The organisation should have a process in place to ensure that the customer ICT equipment is handled securely and in accordance with the customer's information security requirements. The process should include steps such as verifying the customer's identity and authorisation, checking the inventory and condition of the equipment, removing or destroying any labels or stickers that contain information about the equipment or the customer, wiping or erasing any data stored on the equipment, and documenting the actions taken and the results achieved12 The fact that the auditor noticed two servers on a bench with stickers that reveal the server's name, IP address and admin password indicates that the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security is not effective or not followed. This could pose a risk of unauthorised access, disclosure, or modification of the customer's information or systems. Therefore, the auditor should note the audit finding and check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:202212 The other actions are not appropriate for the following reasons:
* A. Asking the ICT Manager to record an information security incident and initiate the information security incident management process is not appropriate because this is not an information security incident that affects the organisation's own information or systems. An information security incident is defined as a single or a series of unwanted or unexpected information security events that have a significant probability of compromising business operations and threatening information security12 In this case, the information security event affects the customer's information or systems, not the organisation's. Therefore, the organisation should follow the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, not the process for information security incident management.
* C. Recording what the auditor has seen in the audit findings, but taking no further action is not appropriate because this would not address the root cause or the impact of the issue. The auditor has a responsibility to verify the effectiveness and compliance of the organisation's information security management system, and to report any nonconformities or opportunities for improvement12 Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* D. Raising a nonconformity against control 5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements is not appropriate because this control is not relevant to the issue. Control 5.31 requires the organisation to identify and comply with the legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements that are applicable to the information security management system12 In this case, the issue is not about the organisation's compliance with the legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements, but about the organisation's control of the externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system. Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* E. Raising a nonconformity against control 8.20 'network security' (networks and network devices shall be secured, managed and controlled to protect information in systems and applications) is not appropriate because this control is not relevant to the issue. Control 8.20 requires the organisation to secure, manage and control its own networks and network devices to protect the information in its systems and applications12 In this case, the issue is not about the organisation's network security, but about the organisation's control of the externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system. Therefore, the auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause 8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
* F. Asking the auditee to remove the labels, then carry on with the audit is not appropriate because this would not address the root cause or the impact of the issue. The auditor should not interfere with the auditee's operations or suggest corrective actions during the audit, as this would compromise the auditor's objectivity and impartiality12 The auditor should check the process for dealing with incoming shipments relating to customer IT security, and determine whether there is a nonconformity with clause
8.1.4 of ISO 27001:2022.
References:
1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2
NEW QUESTION # 192
場景9：UpNet是一家網路公司，已通過ISO/IEC 27001認證。
自從獲得 ISO/IEC 27001 認證以來，該公司的認可度大幅提高。此認證證實了 UpNefs 營運的成熟性及其符合廣泛認可和接受的標準。
但認證之後一切還沒結束。 UpNet 透過進行內部稽核不斷審查和增強其安全控制以及 ISMS 的整體有效性和效率。高階主管不願意聘請全職內部稽核團隊，因此決定將內部稽核職能外包。這種形式的內部稽核確保了獨立性、客觀性，並且在 ISMS 的持續改進方面發揮諮詢作用。
在初次認證審核後不久，該公司創建了一個專門從事數據和儲存產品的新部門。他們提供針對資料中心和基於軟體的網路設備（例如網路虛擬化和網路安全設備）進行最佳化的路由器和交換器。這導致 ISMS 認證範圍內已涵蓋的其他部門的營運發生變化。
所以。 UpNet 啟動了風險評估流程和內部稽核。根據內部審計結果，公司確認了現有和新流程和控制的有效性和效率。
由於新部門符合 ISO/IEC 27001 要求，最高管理層決定將其納入認證範圍。 UpNet宣布取得ISO/IEC 27001認證，認證範圍涵蓋全公司。
在初次認證審核一年後，認證機構對 UpNefs ISMS 進行了另一次審核。
此次審核旨在確定 UpNefs ISMS 是否符合指定的 ISO/IEC 27001 要求，並確保 ISMS 持續改善。審核小組確認，經過認證的 ISMS 繼續符合標準的要求。儘管如此，新部門對管理體系的治理產生了重大影響。此外，認證機構並未獲悉任何變更。因此，UpNefs認證被暫停。
根據上述場景，回答以下問題：
場景 9 最後一段說明了什麼類型的審計？
- A. 監督審核
- B. 內部稽核
- C. 重新認證審核
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 193
......
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Exam Practice Materials Collection: https://www.itpassleader.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN-dumps-pass-exam.html
Use Valid New ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-CN Questions - Top choice Help You Gain Success: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ZPsZXtY3S3YEQgliWgDjx3Xp3HocF01A